by jininthenet
Cordo wrote:
Sounds like a fun session. Is John the guy that you were worried would throw the game -- and whose temperament you had in mind when you house ruled the resource exchanges?
Probably not a good move for Cartels to give FARC six points through Active Opposition in Cali. Were you able to leverage Cali's position as FARC?
jininthenet wrote:
his began the interesting war between them, where Cartel used Crop Substitution to turn Cali from neutral into active opposition, as a show of disgust and this significantly reduced Government's support as Cali has a population of 3! FARC then continued to spread guerrillas and build bases
Probably not a good move for Cartels to give FARC six points through Active Opposition in Cali. Were you able to leverage Cali's position as FARC?
John is the type of player who argues on rule ambiguities...that's because he is a highly competitive gamer and always looking for ways to maximize his position to win the game. Nick is the one who has the temperament to throw the game. They both have this tendency of becoming emotionally charged up whenever things don't go according their plans, or their game play or plans somewhow got screwed by others. But after the game, they are fine. That's the kind of gamer i have in my group whereby both Philip and me tried our best to manage them over the past 10 years during all kinds of game sessions...:what: All four of us are gaming friends for so long and we are used to every reaction from any player, be it positive or negative, and over the years, we sort of compromised, even tolerated when necessary. Or else, we would have split our ways long before this. :laugh: